(1)
Once students enrol in a course of study, their progression through to graduation will be dependent upon meeting minimum success rates and correctly re-enrolling. (2)
The aim of the policy is to identify poorly performing students, so that they may initiate steps to address that poor performance. Students may avail themselves of support services, including counselling and learning support. Where poor performance persists, students face sanctions, including exclusion from the University. (3)
The aim of this policy is to encourage students to explore other options that may be more appropriate for them, and prevent students incurring significant costs. The University believes it must exercise a duty of care to students who incur fees and who are not well suited to tertiary study, and not permit poorly performing students from continuing to study indefinitely. (4)
At the same time, the University recognises that there can be extenuating circumstances for poor performance, and students who are sanctioned have a right of appeal, that may lead to the sanctions being removed or modified. (5)
Students who been enrolled for less than twelve months will not be placed on conditional enrolment or suspended or excluded. (6)
This policy only applies to award coursework programs and does not apply to courses with a significant research component - i.e., research degrees such as Bachelor Honours, Masters Honours, Doctor of Philosophy, and professional doctorates such as the Doctor of Business Administration. (7)
For the purpose of this policy: (8)
The Progression Rules, against which students enrolled in the Bachelor of Medicine / Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) are assessed, are listed in Part B. (9)
Student academic performance is assessed following the examinations and results processing following the end of the Autumn and Spring sessions. (10)
Student academic performance may also be assessed at other times. In these situations, the University may retrospectively impose sanctions on the student. The Academic Registrar has the authority to determine whether sanctions will be applied retrospectively, to, for example: (11)
The Progression Rules, against which students are assessed, are as follows: (12)
The assessment of academic performance will apply the University's Progression Rules, and the following outcomes are possible: (13)
The Progression Rules, against which students enrolled in the MBBS are assessed, are as follows: (14)
The assessment of academic performance will apply these Progression Rules, and the following outcomes are possible: (15)
The University holds the view that any student who passes less than 50% of the credit points attempted in any six month period, is 'at risk' and will advise such students to discuss their future study plans with the appropriate support services and the Head of Program. It is the student's responsibility to recognise they are at risk and to respond accordingly. (16)
The University holds the view that any student who has failed the same, or an equivalent, unit twice, is 'at risk' of exclusion and will advise such students to discuss their future study plans with the appropriate support services and the Head of Program. It is the student's responsibility to recognise they are at risk and to respond accordingly. (17)
Students identified as being "at risk" will receive a personalised communication from the University and their student record will indicate their "at risk" status. (18)
The consequence of being "at risk" is that students face sanctions if poor academic performance continues. (19)
A student who has been placed on twelve months conditional enrolment, and then, in any subsequent six month period of enrolment, (conditional enrolment or otherwise) passes less than 50% of the credit points attempted, is "at risk" of exclusion from the University. The University will advise such students to discuss their future study plans with the appropriate support services and the Head of Program. It is the student's responsibility to recognise they are at risk and to respond accordingly. (20)
Students identified as being "at risk" of exclusion will receive a personalised communication from the University and their student record will indicate their "at risk" of exclusion status. (21)
The consequence of being "at risk" of exclusion is that students face exclusion from the University if poor academic performance continues. (22)
If a student has not previously been on conditional enrolment, and they pass less than 50% of the credit points attempted in any twelve month period, the student will be placed on conditional enrolment for the following twelve months and must enrol for a reduced academic load during that time. (23)
A student placed on conditional enrolment has the right of appeal to the College Education, Assessment and Progression Committee. (24)
If a student has previously been on conditional enrolment, and they pass less than 50% of the credit points attempted in any twelve month period, the student will be excluded from the University for the following twelve months. (25)
A student excluded from study under this clause has the right of appeal to the Academic Senate. (26)
A student who fails the same unit, or a unit deemed equivalent by the University, on three separate occasions, will be excluded from study at the University for a period of twelve months. (27)
A student excluded from study under this clause has the right of appeal to the Academic Senate. (28)
A student who has been placed on conditional enrolment or excluded but has approved leave of absence will be placed on conditional enrolment, or excluded, at the conclusion of their period of leave of absence. (29)
Periods of approved Leave of Absence are not counted for the purpose of this policy. However students do not have the right to prolong their studies by taking periods of unapproved leave of absence. Students failing to re-enrol in the course by the date notified to them by the Office of the Academic Registrar, will be regarded as having abandoned the course of study and will need to apply for re-admission in order to resume studies. (30)
The maximum length of enrolment clauses do not apply to postgraduate coursework courses or courses with a significant research component - i.e. research degrees such as Bachelor Honours, Masters Honours, Doctor of Philosophy, and professional doctorates such as the Doctor of Business Administration. (31)
Failure to complete a course within a reasonable time (like failing the same unit three times, or passing less than half of the credit points for which they were formally enrolled in a calendar year) can be an indicator that a student needs to review their circumstances which may be preventing them from performing adequately. If a student transfers from one course to another under the provisions of the Course Transfer Policy or as the result of a deletion of a course by the University, the maximum time for completion of the second course will be the period specified in this policy [clause (32)] less the time the student has been enrolled in the first course. (32)
The maximum time to complete a course will be one and a half times the minimum time a part-time student would need to complete the course, where the time for completing the course is derived from the total credit points content for the course. Therefore the maximum time for a 240-point Bachelors degree will be nine years. (33)
This maximum time will be adjusted according to the total credit points required for completion, so that an 80-point course will have a maximum time of three years. (34)
The University has determined that students should be able to complete a coursework award within a set maximum period. Students who fail to complete will be excluded. (35)
Students will be excluded for a period of two years if, at the end of an academic year, the student has failed to complete their course in the prescribed maximum time. (36)
A student excluded from study under this clause has the right of appeal to the Academic Senate. (37)
Periods of approved Leave of Absence are not counted for the purpose of this policy. However students do not have the right to prolong their studies by taking periods of unapproved leave of absence. Students failing to re-enrol in the course by the date notified to them by the Office of the Academic Registrar, will be regarded as having abandoned the course of study and will need to apply for re-admission in order to resume studies. (38)
The University believes that students have a right to appeal against a decision that excludes or suspends them from their course of study, or places them on conditional enrolment, for unsatisfactory academic performance. (39)
Students may appeal to the Academic Senate against exclusion, for unsatisfactory academic performance on the grounds defined as misadventure and extenuating circumstances under the Special Consideration Policy. (40)
Students may appeal to the College Education, Assessment and Progression Committee against being placed on conditional enrolment, for unsatisfactory academic performance on the grounds defined as misadventure and extenuating circumstances under the Special Consideration Policy. (41)
An appeal must be in writing and the student will not have an automatic right to appear in person before a committee. Appeals should therefore include appropriate documentation (statements from counsellors, medical certificates, etc.) to substantiate the appellant's grounds for appeal. (42)
Appeals lodged outside the timeframe stated in the notification will not be considered. (43)
These timeframes refer to students whose results have been determined at the end of the main exam period. Appeals from students who have deferred exams in the formal deferred exam period will normally be completed before the census date. (44)
If appeals are determined late, even if the appeal is upheld, and restrictions lifted (for example, conditional enrolment conditions, or a period of exclusion, revoked) the student may not be permitted to enrol for additional units in that session. (45)
Late or non-receipt of official letters from the University will not be accepted as grounds for appeal if the student has not ensured that the University is in receipt of accurate and current contact details. (46)
Students who wish to appeal against exclusion or the decision to put them on conditional enrolment for unsatisfactory academic performance must lodge a written case of appeal within the period stated in the notification. Students must clearly state the grounds for the appeal. (47)
The Chair of Academic Senate and one other College Board of Studies Chair may determine, on behalf of the Academic Senate, that there are no valid grounds on which to uphold an appeal, and therefore that the appeal will be dismissed. The Chair of the Academic Senate may determine, on behalf of the Academic Senate, to uphold the appeal, if there are clear and significant grounds to do so. (48)
On behalf of the Academic Senate, the Chair of Senate will convene a panel to consider appeals that have been received by the due date and have not been upheld or dismissed in accordance with clause (47) above. The panel will consist of: (49)
The Panel may determine to refer the appeal to the Senate's Appeals Committee, where the student will be invited to present a case, or to: (50)
The determination of the Panel will be final. (51)
The Appeals Committees of Academic Senate is defined as: (52)
Any member of the Committee who has previously been involved with the assessment of a particular case before the Committee should excuse themselves from the Committee for the duration of that case. (53)
The Committee must contain at least one member of each gender. (54)
A quorum of the Committee will be the Chair and two members, one of whom must be academic. (55)
The Chair of the College Education, Assessment and Progression Committee may determine, on behalf of the College Education, Assessment and Progression Committee, that there are no valid grounds on which to uphold an appeal, and therefore that the appeal will be dismissed. The Chair of the College Education, Assessment and Progression Committee may determine, on behalf of the College Education, Assessment and Progression Committee, to uphold the appeal, if there are clear and significant grounds to do so. (56)
On behalf of the Academic Senate, the Chair of the College Education, Assessment and Progression Committee will convene a meeting of the College Education, Assessment and Progression Committee's Appeals Panel to consider appeals that have been received by the due date and have not been upheld or dismissed in accordance with clause (55) above. (57)
The membership of the Appeals Panel is Associate Dean (Academic) or nominee as Chair, and two other individuals who are either Heads of School or Heads of Programs within the College. (58)
Any member of the Appeals Panel who has previously been involved with the assessment of a particular case before the Panel should excuse themselves from the Appeals Panel for the duration of that case. (59)
The Appeals Panel must contain at least one member of each gender. (60)
The College Education, Assessment and Progression Committee's Appeals Panel may: (61)
The determination of the College Education, Assessment and Progression Committee's Appeals Panel will be final. (62)
The secretary to the Appeals Committee will, no later than five working days prior to the date of the Appeals Committee hearing, forward a copy of the appeal papers to each member of the Appeals Committee. The student's copy will be sent by certified post. (63)
At the hearing of the appeal by a student: (64)
At the conclusion of the hearing, everyone present, with the exception of members of the Appeals Committee, will retire from the hearing to allow the Appeals Committee to reach a determination. In reaching a determination, the Appeals Committee may: (65)
The Academic Registrar will normally advise the student in writing via certified post of the outcome of the appeal no later than five working days before the beginning of session. (66)
The determination of the Appeals Committees will be final. (67)
Where a student lodges an appeal to the Senate or to the College Education, Assessment and Progression Committee in accordance with the provisions of Part F above and the information is of a highly sensitive or personal nature, students may submit those details in a sealed envelope clearly marked 'confidential'. (68)
Such material will be treated with the utmost confidentiality and will only be seen by the Chair, who will decide how the material should be considered. This material will be returned to the student in person or by registered mail. (69)
Where a student wishes to orally disclose information of a highly sensitive nature they may do so by contacting the Chair of Senate in the case of an appeal against exclusion, or the Chair of the College Appeals Panel in the case of an appeal against placement on conditional enrolment. (70)
Where the Chair decides that the material should be considered by the Appeals Panel or the Appeals Committee, the student will be advised. (71)
Where the Chair decides that the material is of such a highly sensitive or personal nature that it should not be considered by the Appeals Panel or the Appeals Committee he/she will make a recommendation as to an appropriate course of action to the Panel or Appeals Committee, for its consideration. (72)
The University will make determinations on academic appeals as soon as practicable, but will not necessarily resolve any particular case before the close of enrolments for the next session. An application should be received from the student to continue with their enrolment up to the census date. A student whose appeal will not be resolved before the commencement of session (where the delay is not the fault of the student) will be issued with a letter of authorisation from the Academic Registrar to audit units, pending the outcome of the appeal. The Academic Registrar will determine the enrolment status on a case-by-case basis should the matter not be resolved by the census date. (73)
If the appeal is upheld, the student will be permitted to enrol in the recommended course of study. No late enrolment penalties will apply provided the student enrols within seven days after receiving the advice from the University. However, if appeals are determined after the census date, even if the appeal is upheld, and restrictions lifted (for example, conditional enrolment conditions, or a period of exclusion, revoked) the student will not be permitted to enrol for additional units in that session. (74)
Nil.Progression and Unsatisfactory Academic Progress Policy
Section 1 - Purpose and Context
Section 2 - Definitions
Section 3 - Policy Statement
Part A - Progression Rules
Part B - Progression Rules for students studying the Bachelor of Medicine / Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS)
Part C - At Risk
"At Risk" - Student has not been sanctioned for unsatisfactory academic performance
"At Risk" - Student has previously been sanctioned for unsatisfactory academic performance by being placed on conditional enrolment
Part D - Conditional Enrolment or Exclusion Resulting From Unsatisfactory Academic Performance
Conditional Enrolment
Exclusion - Passing Less than 50% of the Credit Points in Twelve Months, having been on Conditional Enrolment
Exclusion - Multiple Failure of Units
Conditions for Conditional Enrolment and Exclusion
Part E - Maximum Length of Enrolment
Part F - Appeals Against Exclusion or Suspension or Placement on Conditional Enrolment for Unsatisfactory Academic Performance
Appeals Against Exclusion
Appeals Against Placement on Conditional Enrolment
Section 4 - Procedures
Appeals heard by the Senate's Appeals Committee
Additional Evidence of a Highly Sensitive or Personal Nature
Status of Students Awaiting the Outcome of an Appeal
Section 5 - Guidelines
View Current
This is not a current document. To view the current version, click the link in the document's navigation bar.