Status and Details

Status and Details

This page contains information about the status, approval and a summary of the changes from the previous version of the document. Please note that the Unit Head listed on this page is the current owner of this policy and may not reflect the University position/staff member who owned this policy at the time of publication.

Progression and Unsatisfactory Academic Progress Policy

Show Field Notes
Status Historic Indicates if this version of the document is in effect (Current), yet to come into effect (Future), or expired (Historic).
Effective Date 26th November 2018 This is the date on which this version of the document came into effect.
Review Date 26th November 2021 The next review of this document is scheduled to commence on this date.
Approval Authority Academic Senate The noted authority approved this is version of the document.
Approval Date 26th November 2018 This is the date on which this version of the document was approved by the authorised authority.
Expiry Date 23rd August 2020 This is the date on which this version expires. It may still apply, conditionally, after this date.
Unit Head Jess Gleeson
Director, Data Integrity, Quality and Operations
j.gleeson@westernsydney.edu.au
This is the officer generally responsible for day to day administrative matters.
Enquiries Contact Radhika Bhandari
Examinations, Results and Progression Manager
2600
General enquiries should be directed to the officer/area listed.

Summary of Changes from Previous Version

11 June 2020 – Deleted redundant position title “Director, Equity and Diversity” and replaced with “Senior Manager, Equity and Diversity”.


15 May 2020 – Inserted note and hyperlink related to the Suspension or Variation Instrument – Progression and Unsatisfactory Academic Progress Policy currently in place due to the COVID-19 crisis.


13 November 2019 – Policy updated to reflect position title change – Pro Vice-Chancellor, Learning Transformations renamed Pro Vice-Chancellor, Learning Futures.


The implementation plan for the new Academic Appeals Procedures noted that a targeted review of policies with appeals provisions would be required to ensure alignment with the new published procedures. This review identified a required change to clause (51) to include that procedural fairness considerations are assessed by the Progression Appeals Panel and therefore the provisions of the Academic Appeals Procedures do not subsequently apply. The current review schedule is to be maintained.



Clauses Amended:Policy: All