Document Feedback - Review and Comment
Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document
How to make a comment?
1. Use this to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.
2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment" button located in the lower-right of the comment box.
3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.
4. When you have finished making comments proceed to the next stage by clicking on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.
Important Information
During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity. If you do not have JavaScript running you will recieve a message to advise you of the length of time before the time-out. If you have JavaScript enabled, the time-out is lengthy and should not cause difficulty, however you should note the following tips to avoid losing your comments or corrupting your entries:
-
DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.
-
DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time. Complete and submit all comments for one document before commenting on another.
-
DO NOT leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments. The system will email you a copy of your comments so you can identify where you were up to and add to them later.
-
DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.
(1) The primary purpose of the Research Awards Policy is to recognise and reward the excellent achievements of University staff. (2) The Awards are intended to: (3) The Awards will support the strategic research goals of the University and will act as a channel for monitoring and celebrating achievement by individuals groups and teams. (5) The Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President, Research, Engagement, Development and International will call for nominations each year for awards to university staff whose outstanding dedication, creativity and excellence in research performance and service have had, or are having a significant impact on the University's progress towards the achievement of its mission. (6) The award is available to: (7) Currently employed full or part-time staff of the University who have worked at the University for a minimum of one year are eligible for individual nomination, or as leaders of team nominations. (8) For team nominations, staff who do not satisfy these eligibility criteria, but whose contribution to the Award initiative is to be acknowledged, may be included as members of a team nomination. (9) Winners of awards (either individuals or teams) in a particular category are not eligible for nomination (as an individual or team leader) in the following year in the same category. However, previous recipients of highly commended nominations can reapply. These nominations will be required to demonstrate progress from their previous year's submissions. (10) The Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President, Research, Engagement, Development and International Excellence awards are intended to recognise achievements over the previous one to three year period, although in some categories of award it is anticipated that submissions may include briefly summarised background material from longer than three years ago in order to contextualise these achievements. (11) Nominations must be made on the forms designated for each Award and available through the Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President, Research, Engagement, Development and International website. Advice and assistance in the preparation of submissions is available from the Office of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President, REDI and Office of Human Resources. (12) It is a condition of entry to the Awards that further enquiries can be made of a factual nature of the submission. (13) There are two categories of Award, available each year. (14) In relevant categories capacity will exist to award an individual and/or a team winner, and to award a highly commended to an individual and/or team. Awards need not necessarily be made in every category. A trophy will be awarded to winners (team or individual) in each category. However, each person (whether nominated as an individual or as a member of a team) will receive a framed certificate. (15) The total allocation of funds for the Awards and their distribution across the Award categories will be determined on an annual basis. Award funds can be spent on either the further development of the initiatives(s) for which the Award has been conferred, or the further professional development of the staff nominee(s). Award funds are expected to be spent within one calendar year. Individual winners may also elect to take their prize money as cash (paid through payroll) after tax. Where a team agrees unanimously to an equal split by each team member, the team can opt to take their prize money as cash paid to individuals (through payroll) after tax. Cash prizes can also be donated to a registered charity or as a contribution to superannuation. The Guidelines prescribe conditions for expenditure and acquittal of the Award funds. (16) Overall administrative co-ordination of the Awards scheme will be undertaken by the Office of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President, REDI in consultation with the Office of Human Resources. (17) The membership of the Awards panels is outlined in the attached table (see Associated Information). Where members are unavailable, the Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President, Research, Engagement, Development and International or Pro Vice-Chancellor, Research and Innovation, will approve substitute members. Each Awards Panel will consider nominations against the specified selection criteria and will make recommendations, justified against these criteria, to the Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President, Research, Engagement, Development and International. (18) Awards will be presented at the annual University Awards. Announcements about Award recipients will be disseminated broadly. Additionally, Award recipients will be invited to prepare a written account about their achievements and innovations and/or make presentations at suitable occasions and forums. (20) Refer to the Research Awards Guidelines.Research Awards Policy
Section 1 - Purpose and Context
Section 2 - Definitions
Top of PageSection 3 - Policy Statement
Part A - Call for Nominations
Part B - Eligibility for Awards
Part C - Nomination Process and Submissions
Part D - Award Categories and Nature of Prize
Table 1: Award Categories and Prizes
Maximum Number of Awards in Each Category
Ranking
Maximum Amount for Each Individual Awards
Maximum Amount for Each Team
Trophy*
Framed Certificates*
1 x 1 Individual 1 x 1 Team
Winner
$4,000
$6,000 team of two or $8,000 team of three or more
P
P
2 x Individual 2 x Team
Highly Commended
-
-
P
P
Part E - Funding and Expenditure
Part F - Administration of the Awards Scheme
Part G - The Awards Panel
Part H - Dissemination of Outcomes
Section 4 - Procedures
Top of PageSection 5 - Guidelines